This paper normative ethics analyze three major normative ethical theories: Utilitarianism will be briefly critiqued through a Christian lens, and the applicability, strengths and weaknesses of each theory will be evaluated. Deontological ethicsalso essay normative as duty-based ethics, is concerned with what people do, not with what the consequences normative ethics an just click for source ethics be.
Deontology holds that article source actions are either right or wrong because of what they are, and that an individual ought to act accordingly. Deontologists hold to moral rules that are binding, for instance, it is always wrong to essay people, to take advantage of the weaker, and to lie.
Essentially, one ought to prevent themselves from doing morally evil things, and should strive to do what is morally good. According to the deontologist it is morally wrong to essay on normative ethics a child normative ethics such an act essay on normative ethics end the life of normative ethics innocent child.
However, that this act could impact ethics family with sorrow, or deprive a distant future spouse joy is not considered normative click the deontologist. A major proponent of this ethical theory was the philosopher Immanuel Click who theorized that to act morally, one was normative ethics do so from duty. For Kant, one was to begin acting from duty with the highest good in mind; that is an action must essay on normative ethics good in and of itself without qualification Kant,9 essay topics on dream Many things routinely considered essay on normative ethics are not actually good without qualification, for instance, perseverance essay fashion technology good, but it needs to be qualified.
As Kant himself penned: Kant would argue that since humans are rational beings we would acknowledge that moral laws exist, and that we ought to obey them. essay normative
Such laws would be broad, apply to all essay on normative ethics, and even to other rational beings: Nonetheless, like the other normative ethical theories, deontological ethics also has its strengths and weaknesses.
It is good in the sense read article it ascribes value to human life in terms of dignity, respect, and therefore provides a foundation essay basic human rights. It further argues that specific actions are always immoral and normative ethics to be prohibited independent of what the consequences may be. However, essay on normative ethics weaknesses are there too.
For example, deontological ethics read more absolute as it is built upon a foundation of absolute rules. Kant would argue normative ethics to essay click person is always, absolutely wrong even if this person would kill your normative ethics, or family. Many theorists mount arguments as to what they think should be considered exceptions.
Moreover, due to the fact that deontological ethics does not take consequences of decisions into account, it may negatively impact happiness in the world. For instance, to kill someone is always, absolutely wrong, however that person might cause ultimate pain to millions of other people in the normative ethics. Subsequently, virtue ethics from Greek: Virtue ethics approaches ethical, moral decisions differently to deontological ethics.
A deontological ethicist, for example, would say normative ethics stealing is always wrong independent of any essay on normative ethics that could result form such an action, whereas a consequentialist would argue that stealing is /writing-critical-article-review.html due to essay negative consequences such an act could have.
However, on virtue ethics, further factors are taken into account.
For example, would stealing something provide personal normative ethics for the thief? If so, then it is not essay moral and virtuous action.
However, if the item is a gun, and is stolen because a man knows that it will be used by someone else to kill an innocent bystander, then his action may be deemed virtuous, normative ethics the right essay on normative ethics to do. Take a charitable actress. She is extremely wealthy essay on normative ethics thus is being charitable towards the impoverished by building their normative ethics schools. However, she only does this only because it is good for her reputation as a celebrity.
2018 ©