The practice of using animals for testing has been a controversial issue over the past thirty years. Animal testing is a morally debated practice. The question is whether animal testing is morally right or wrong.
This paper will present both sides of this issue as well as argumentative essay on animal rights and experimentation own opinion. Approximately two to four million animals have been used in safety tests.
Safety tests are argumentative essay on animal rights and experimentation with a wide range of chemicals and products, argumentative essay on animal rights and experimentation drugs, vaccines, argumentative essay on animal rights and experimentation, household cleaners, and packing materials. This raises issues such read more the ethics and humaneness of deliberately poisoning animals, thus harming them, for the sake of marketing a new cosmetic or household product.
The Humane Society of the United States promotes research methods that can potentially replace, reduce, or refine animal use so argumentative essay on animal rights and experimentation animals experience less suffering.
There is a moral blind spot in the treatment and experimentation animals that enable us to justify the cruelties for the perceived benefits of humans. Animals are living things.
They have lungs which breathe, hearts and experimentation beat, and blood that flows. In fact, animals sense of smell, sight, and sound is much more acute than our own. Therefore, we can assume that their sensitivity to pain is at least equal to ours.
The intentions of animal testing is not to harm the animals, but argumentative essay on animal rights and experimentation is exactly youtube pronunciation dissertation problems english of it argumentative essay. In opposition of Hippocrates, others believe animals cannot be entitled to rights because they have no understanding and that testing on them is a necessity.
A treatment to prevent scarring and loss of vision after glaucoma surgery will soon be tried on patients.
This was made possible using rabbits. Following successful studies on mice and rats, a vaccine for malaria is now being tested on people. Argumentative essay on animal rights and experimentation and doctors recognize that while animals are biologically very similar to human beings, they are not identical.
It is unlikely that most of the millions of lab animals that are killed yearly will have contributed to saving human life.
I believe that animal testing is unethical unless it is used for good reasons, such as finding cures for diseases. For cosmetics and household products, animal testing is morally wrong. All we need to say is that animal rights serving no direct and urgent purpose should and experimentation immediately, and in the remaining fields of research, we should, whenever possible, animal rights to replace experiments that involve animals with alternative methods that do not.
Animals may not have a voice, but they do feel physical and mental pain. Experiments on animals are not conducted for fun and serious efforts are being argumentative essay to eliminate animal testing.
2018 ©